If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
Miss L. Toe wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Steven L. wrote: Experts: Air security focuses on past threats Laptops, cell phones and watches pose potential danger I figured out the solution to this and all other passenger-born attacks on commercial aviation a long time ago: Trusted flyer identification Frequent airline travelers, or those who wish to avoid the more draconian security measures can voluntarily submit themselves to an FBI security check. Those who successfully pass the security check (and nobody who's visited Pakistan will ever pass), Does that include people who have worked at the US embassy in Pakistan ? No, those people should just be shot immediately. Just to be safe. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
In article , Ron O'Neal
wrote: "(PeteCresswell)" wrote in message news Per Steven L.: and assemble their weapon in a locked restroom, security experts warn. Obvious solution: locate the facilities in the middle of the cabin with no doors or curtains. It would even have additional value as passenger entertainment. -- PeteCresswell I hear the next terrorist tactic is to immobilize passengers and crew with spray cans of Silly String. Hey - that stuff and a lighter can be pretty dangerous, I hear. -- ~~~ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
wrote in message ups.com... Miss L. Toe wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Steven L. wrote: Experts: Air security focuses on past threats Laptops, cell phones and watches pose potential danger I figured out the solution to this and all other passenger-born attacks on commercial aviation a long time ago: Trusted flyer identification Frequent airline travelers, or those who wish to avoid the more draconian security measures can voluntarily submit themselves to an FBI security check. Those who successfully pass the security check (and nobody who's visited Pakistan will ever pass), Does that include people who have worked at the US embassy in Pakistan ? No, those people should just be shot immediately. Just to be safe. With ex-ambassadors first on the list ? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
Steven L. wrote:
Experts: Air security focuses on past threats Laptops, cell phones and watches pose potential danger (AP) -- The next terrorist attack could be carried out by airline passengers who hide bomb ingredients in hair gel or baby milk bottles and assemble their weapon in a locked restroom, security experts warn. The announcement Thursday of a foiled plot to blow up jetliners flying from London to the U.S. using explosives hidden in hand luggage could be the opening of a new chapter in air travel, they said: hours-long security checks, visual inspections of prescription drugs, bans on everyday items. Bomb experts and troubleshooters for airline security interviewed by The Associated Press said mobile phones, computers, wrist watches or anything else with a battery should be prohibited from flights. Perhaps most chillingly, they warned that security staff at airports are not looking for the right things -- and the change in tactics required would likely overwhelm current security operations. "That theater we see, of people taking off shoes, is not going to stop a suicide bomber. The terrorists have already sniffed out the weak spots and are adopting new tactics," said Irish security analyst Tom Clonan, who noted that security measures usually are designed for the last attack, not the next threat. He said a terrorist group will almost certainly try to blow up a plane with a bomb assembled on board unless security measures improve fundamentally. Anti-terrorist authorities in Britain and the United States declined to describe the bomb design in the foiled plot -- whether it was primarily liquid or, more likely, contained liquids in a more complex ingredient list. Whatever the case, experts predicted passengers may soon have to change their travel habits radically. "Every businessman needs to have his laptop on a long-haul flight, and now you won't be able to. Even a battery-operated watch would provide enough power for a detonator. All you need is one shock," said Alan Hatcher, managing director of the International School for Security and Explosives Education in Salisbury, England. Airlines have toyed with the idea of banning innocuous personal-care items from carry-on luggage following previous security scares, only to have the focus change because of the difficulty of enforcing tougher rules. But Thursday's developments could dramatically increase the likelihood that security will come first no matter what the logistical hurdles. The technology for the kind of liquid or crystallized explosives possibly involved in the thwarted terror plot is not new. The threat first appeared in January 1995 in the Philippines, when police stumbled on a suspected al-Qaeda plot to target U.S.-bound planes with bombs based on nitroglycerine carried on board in containers for contact lens solution. At that time, aviation authorities announced plans to ban aerosols, bottled gels and containers of liquids holding more than 30 milliliters, about an ounce, on U.S. airliners departing Manila, but the idea was never properly enforced. Even then, baby formula was excluded from the ban -- even though, in powdered form, it can provide a good vehicle for masking crystallized explosives. A decade later in Belfast, Northern Ireland, an Algerian man was convicted of possessing 25 computer disks detailing how to bring down an aircraft using, among other things, crystallized explosives hidden in a container of talcum powder. During that trial, FBI explosives expert Donald Sachtleben testified he built and detonated three bombs based on the instructions found in the Algerian's home. Despite this decade-old knowledge, airport security officials around the globe still permit passengers to carry a wide range of containers onto planes without any visual inspection. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/10/ter....ap/index.html [ Basically, you'll have to board the plane with the clothes on your back, and whatever emergency medicines you have to take during the flight. Nothing else. Probably not even a hearing aid if you need one. The not-so-friendly skies. Soon stripped naked and chained to your seat will be "the only way to fly"! Cheers, Bama Brian Libertarian |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:01:22 GMT, "Steven L."
wrote: Experts: Air security focuses on past threats Laptops, cell phones and watches pose potential danger (AP) -- The next terrorist attack could be carried out by airline passengers who hide bomb ingredients in hair gel or baby milk bottles and assemble their weapon in a locked restroom, security experts warn. The announcement Thursday of a foiled plot to blow up jetliners flying from London to the U.S. using explosives hidden in hand luggage could be the opening of a new chapter in air travel, they said: hours-long security checks, visual inspections of prescription drugs, bans on everyday items. Bomb experts and troubleshooters for airline security interviewed by The Associated Press said mobile phones, computers, wrist watches or anything else with a battery should be prohibited from flights. Perhaps most chillingly, they warned that security staff at airports are not looking for the right things -- and the change in tactics required would likely overwhelm current security operations. "That theater we see, of people taking off shoes, is not going to stop a suicide bomber. The terrorists have already sniffed out the weak spots and are adopting new tactics," said Irish security analyst Tom Clonan, who noted that security measures usually are designed for the last attack, not the next threat. He said a terrorist group will almost certainly try to blow up a plane with a bomb assembled on board unless security measures improve fundamentally. Anti-terrorist authorities in Britain and the United States declined to describe the bomb design in the foiled plot -- whether it was primarily liquid or, more likely, contained liquids in a more complex ingredient list. Whatever the case, experts predicted passengers may soon have to change their travel habits radically. "Every businessman needs to have his laptop on a long-haul flight, and now you won't be able to. Even a battery-operated watch would provide enough power for a detonator. All you need is one shock," said Alan Hatcher, managing director of the International School for Security and Explosives Education in Salisbury, England. Airlines have toyed with the idea of banning innocuous personal-care items from carry-on luggage following previous security scares, only to have the focus change because of the difficulty of enforcing tougher rules. But Thursday's developments could dramatically increase the likelihood that security will come first no matter what the logistical hurdles. The technology for the kind of liquid or crystallized explosives possibly involved in the thwarted terror plot is not new. The threat first appeared in January 1995 in the Philippines, when police stumbled on a suspected al-Qaeda plot to target U.S.-bound planes with bombs based on nitroglycerine carried on board in containers for contact lens solution. At that time, aviation authorities announced plans to ban aerosols, bottled gels and containers of liquids holding more than 30 milliliters, about an ounce, on U.S. airliners departing Manila, but the idea was never properly enforced. Even then, baby formula was excluded from the ban -- even though, in powdered form, it can provide a good vehicle for masking crystallized explosives. A decade later in Belfast, Northern Ireland, an Algerian man was convicted of possessing 25 computer disks detailing how to bring down an aircraft using, among other things, crystallized explosives hidden in a container of talcum powder. During that trial, FBI explosives expert Donald Sachtleben testified he built and detonated three bombs based on the instructions found in the Algerian's home. Despite this decade-old knowledge, airport security officials around the globe still permit passengers to carry a wide range of containers onto planes without any visual inspection. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/10/ter....ap/index.html [ Basically, you'll have to board the plane with the clothes on your back, and whatever emergency medicines you have to take during the flight. Nothing else. Probably not even a hearing aid if you need one. The not-so-friendly skies. ] Still, it's safer than driving. LOL! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
ZenIsWhen wrote:
"Steven L." wrote in message ink.net... Experts: Air security focuses on past threats Laptops, cell phones and watches pose potential danger (AP) -- The next terrorist attack could be carried out by airline passengers who hide bomb ingredients in hair gel or baby milk bottles and assemble their weapon in a locked restroom, security experts warn. The announcement Thursday of a foiled plot to blow up jetliners flying from London to the U.S. using explosives hidden in hand luggage could be the opening of a new chapter in air travel, they said: hours-long security checks, visual inspections of prescription drugs, bans on everyday items. Bomb experts and troubleshooters for airline security interviewed by The Associated Press said mobile phones, computers, wrist watches or anything else with a battery should be prohibited from flights. Perhaps most chillingly, they warned that security staff at airports are not looking for the right things -- and the change in tactics required would likely overwhelm current security operations. "That theater we see, of people taking off shoes, is not going to stop a suicide bomber. The terrorists have already sniffed out the weak spots and are adopting new tactics," said Irish security analyst Tom Clonan, who noted that security measures usually are designed for the last attack, not the next threat. He said a terrorist group will almost certainly try to blow up a plane with a bomb assembled on board unless security measures improve fundamentally. Anti-terrorist authorities in Britain and the United States declined to describe the bomb design in the foiled plot -- whether it was primarily liquid or, more likely, contained liquids in a more complex ingredient list. Whatever the case, experts predicted passengers may soon have to change their travel habits radically. "Every businessman needs to have his laptop on a long-haul flight, and now you won't be able to. Even a battery-operated watch would provide enough power for a detonator. All you need is one shock," said Alan Hatcher, managing director of the International School for Security and Explosives Education in Salisbury, England. Airlines have toyed with the idea of banning innocuous personal-care items from carry-on luggage following previous security scares, only to have the focus change because of the difficulty of enforcing tougher rules. But Thursday's developments could dramatically increase the likelihood that security will come first no matter what the logistical hurdles. The technology for the kind of liquid or crystallized explosives possibly involved in the thwarted terror plot is not new. The threat first appeared in January 1995 in the Philippines, when police stumbled on a suspected al-Qaeda plot to target U.S.-bound planes with bombs based on nitroglycerine carried on board in containers for contact lens solution. At that time, aviation authorities announced plans to ban aerosols, bottled gels and containers of liquids holding more than 30 milliliters, about an ounce, on U.S. airliners departing Manila, but the idea was never properly enforced. Even then, baby formula was excluded from the ban -- even though, in powdered form, it can provide a good vehicle for masking crystallized explosives. A decade later in Belfast, Northern Ireland, an Algerian man was convicted of possessing 25 computer disks detailing how to bring down an aircraft using, among other things, crystallized explosives hidden in a container of talcum powder. During that trial, FBI explosives expert Donald Sachtleben testified he built and detonated three bombs based on the instructions found in the Algerian's home. Despite this decade-old knowledge, airport security officials around the globe still permit passengers to carry a wide range of containers onto planes without any visual inspection. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/10/ter....ap/index.html [ Basically, you'll have to board the plane with the clothes on your back, and whatever emergency medicines you have to take during the flight. Nothing else. Probably not even a hearing aid if you need one. The not-so-friendly skies. ] -- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. The end result seems to be having the passengers submit to a strip search, the likes of which are used with prisoners entering prison. and, as we all know, those strip searches have NEVER stopped the flow of money, drugs, and weapons into the prisons - or control of the outside FROM within those prisons. That's because the prison is still on the ground, and visitors come and go every day. In this case, the "prison" is at 40,000 feet, and nobody can get in or out. At altitude, you're more isolated than if you were imprisoned at Leavenworth. -- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
Steven L. wrote:
In effect, that would result in racial profiling. Any Pakistani nationals, Saudi nationals, Iranian nationals, etc., would never qualify for the biometric identity card--since nationals from all those countries have been linked to terrorism before. Since Americans have been linked to terrorism, would all Americans be profiled? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The End of Carry-on Laptops, Cell Phones, Wris****ches, etc.
ZenIsWhen wrote: The end result seems to be having the passengers submit to a strip search, the likes of which are used with prisoners entering prison. and, as we all know, those strip searches have NEVER stopped the flow of money, drugs, and weapons into the prisons - or control of the outside FROM within those prisons. That's because they are brought in by people who work for the prison. If I were American, I could get a job at a US prison. Lousy pay in some states, but reasonable benefits. They strip search prisoners going in, they do some screening on visitors, but to the best of my knowledge, they don't search employees. If they did, they certainly wouldn't be doing by strip search. When that starts, that stuff won't get into prisons either. S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wireless Internet and Cell Phones on Ships | Andy P. Jung | Cruises | 2 | August 6th, 2006 10:05 PM |
Wireless Internet and Cell Phones on Ships | RichC | Cruises | 0 | August 5th, 2006 11:28 AM |
Cell Phones on Carnival! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 16 | June 27th, 2006 01:15 AM |
The 411 on World Phones | Ablang | Travel - anything else not covered | 5 | July 4th, 2005 02:47 PM |
Cell phones on airplanes | FDM | Europe | 15 | December 29th, 2004 10:00 AM |