If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
proffsl wrote:
"Alohacyberian" wrote: "proffsl" wrote: Dave apparently considers cites where our courts recognize our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways as "crap sites"! You need to brush up on your definitions of legal terms. Ad Hominem. Pointing out your ignorance is not an ad hominem. It is just stating the obvious. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote: "Alohacyberian" wrote: "proffsl" wrote: "Alohacyberian" wrote: LOL! Hilarious! The malcontented mouse who roared because he can't get a driver license. Care to put your money where your mouth is? Say $40,000? Sure. Bring it on. Then, deposit your $40,000 with a lawyer of your choosing, and provide his contact information here. I don't know where you live, You don't know where I live, yet, in your own asshole manner, you presume and pretend to have information about me even more personal than those around me, who DO know where I live, have. You are pathetic. but lawyers don't do that sort of thing here. I'm sure they would. They enjoy making money. But, I'm equally sure you have no intention of putting YOUR MONEY where YOUR SLANDEROUS MOUTH IS. Cheap shots are what you are mostly about. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
Dave Smith wrote:
proffsl wrote: "Alohacyberian" wrote: "proffsl" wrote: Dave apparently considers cites where our courts recognize our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways as "crap sites"! You need to brush up on your definitions of legal terms. Ad Hominem. Pointing out your ignorance is not an ad hominem. It is just stating the obvious. Yet another Ad Hominem. And, beyond your issuance of Ad Hominems, what is obvious is that all of my claims are verified and proven. The Operation of Motor Vehicles on our public highways is indeed a Right, recognized by our federal courts and by our state courts. I have no idea why that knowledge disturbs you so much that you must resort to Ad Hominems and personal attacks, unless you view this information as a threat to your imagined authoritarian stature. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing is all about highway safety
wrote:
(Carole Allen) wrote: proffsl Point A: I have stated, and proven, that courts have recognized our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways: That's ONE court, ONE state. However, the decision he is citing CONTRADICTS him. You are such a LIAR. Our Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized: "The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d 46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark Wilder (2003) - http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...033/wilder.pdf Clearly the Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized. Deny it if you wish to further prove you are a foolish liar. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
wrote:
(Carole Allen) wrote: proffsl wrote: Point A: I have stated, and proven, that courts have recognized our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways: That's ONE court, ONE state. However, the decision he is citing CONTRADICTS him. You are such a LIAR. Our Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized: "The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d 46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark Wilder (2003) - http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...033/wilder.pdf Clearly the Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized. Deny it if you wish to further prove you are a foolish liar. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
proffsl wrote:
You are such a LIAR. WAAHHHHHH That's an ad homenum. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
"proffsl" wrote in message
ups.com... "Alohacyberian" wrote: "proffsl" wrote: Dave apparently considers cites where our courts recognize our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways as "crap sites"! You need to brush up on your definitions of legal terms. Ad Hominem. Couldn't refute the argument, huh? KM -- (-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators! Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/ |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
"proffsl" wrote in message
oups.com... "Alohacyberian" wrote: I don't know where you live, You don't know where I live, yet, in your own asshole manner, you presume and pretend to have information about me even more personal than those around me, who DO know where I live, have. You are pathetic. I may be pathetic, but, I have a driver license. You don't. KM -- (-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators! Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/ |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing not about highway safety
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote: "Alohacyberian" wrote: I don't know where you live, You don't know where I live, yet, in your own asshole manner, you presume and pretend to have information about me even more personal than those around me, who DO know where I live, have. You are pathetic. I may be pathetic, but, I have a driver license. You don't. What makes you so damn pathetic is that after you have been so thoroughly proven wrong in regards to your ignorance of our Right to operate motor vehicles on our public highways, your only resort is to fabricate accusations against myself which you are completely and pathetically unable to produce even one shread of evidence in support of. "The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d 46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark Wilder (2003) - http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...033/wilder.pdf http://proffsl.110mb.com/ |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Driver Licensing is all about highway safety
On Oct 16, 3:39 pm, proffsl wrote:
wrote: (Carole Allen) wrote: proffsl Point A: I have stated, and proven, that courts have recognized our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways: That's ONE court, ONE state. However, the decision he is citing CONTRADICTS him. You are such a LIAR. Listen, fuzznuts, if you wish to start personal abuse and insults once again as you always seem to do, be prepared to get it right back in your lying face. Now, to the point. Nothing I said is a lie. What I said is true - the court decision you have been citing CONTRADICTS you. Idaho vs Wilder - and indeed, the underlying Idaho vs Pocatello - both UPHELD licensing. This, bird brain, is what we call a CONTRADICTION of your position that driver licensing is unconstitutional. The exact OPPOSITE was found. Therefore, I told the TRUTH. I do hope you get that straight and that you now refrain from further initiation of personal insults. Got it? Our Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized: Indeed, but only with a license. You cannot illogically leave out this integral part of, as we have shown you repeatedly for 18 months, the ordinary way of conducting or travel by motor vehicle. "The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d 46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark Wilder (2003) -http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/idahostatecases/app/1033/wilder.pdf This case UPHOLDS licensing. As I said, it CONTRADICTS you. You cannot accept one sentence from that decision and hold it apart from the body of the decision. Clearly the Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public highways has been recognized. Deny it if you wish to further prove you are a foolish liar. What CONTRADICTS you is the full ruling itself which holds the exact OPPOSITE of your long-held and long-refuted false claims. So YOU continue to post it and prove YOU are a foolish liar. I have told the truth. You refuse to accept it and persist in your utterly disproven claims. You are wrong and have been proven so. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Driver Licensing serves no purpose for highway safety | proffsl | USA & Canada | 0 | September 17th, 2007 09:50 AM |
Become an Activist for Better Health! Join Bio Pro's Company to promote the Safety Wireless Initiative! safety for Cell Phones & Bio Pro Technology! research Its a WIN WIN! | [email protected] | Asia | 0 | July 27th, 2007 03:41 AM |
Safety for Cell Phones-Mobile Hazards-Cell Phone Safety-Bio Pro Universal Cell Chip, Purchase from a Bio Pro Consultant, Destress EMF Radiation in Australia, South Africa, United States, New Zealand, and Canada!! | [email protected] | Europe | 0 | June 6th, 2007 03:47 AM |
Smart Card BIO PRO, Purchase products from Bio Pro Consultant,Australia,New Zealand,South Africa,Canada,A New Generation of wellness and safety, Safety for Electronics with Bio Pro | [email protected] | Europe | 0 | May 6th, 2007 06:07 PM |
Licensing tellys | [email protected] | Europe | 2 | October 12th, 2004 03:23 AM |