If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
British Airways
"Richard" wrote in message ... "Michael G" wrote in message ... Most airlines have worked out that it is more convenient for passengers to be boarded by rows so that people who sit close to the front of the plane don't impede passengers trying to find their seats at the rear. Your staff at LGW have not grasped this simple concept. No, you're the one who hasn't grasped the concept. If the passengers seated in the front were to board first, then they would block the aisles for those passenegers with seats at the back of the plane while they stowed their carry-ons. When the passegners seated at the back board first, they quickly make their way to the back since they've no reason to loiter around the front. That's why boarding is done from back to front when it's not done as a free-for-all. I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? ant |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"ant" wrote in message ... "Richard" wrote in message ... "Michael G" wrote in message ... Most airlines have worked out that it is more convenient for passengers to be boarded by rows so that people who sit close to the front of the plane don't impede passengers trying to find their seats at the rear. Your staff at LGW have not grasped this simple concept. No, you're the one who hasn't grasped the concept. If the passengers seated in the front were to board first, then they would block the aisles for those passenegers with seats at the back of the plane while they stowed their carry-ons. When the passegners seated at the back board first, they quickly make their way to the back since they've no reason to loiter around the front. That's why boarding is done from back to front when it's not done as a free-for-all. I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? ant More like they were boarding by rows as is the norm and he missed it. BA are not perfect but the aircrew are certainly not rude. As for the luggage. Complete rubbish, they can't wait to get it out of the way and the cabin secure. If it was a problem it should have been in the hold. JRs |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"ant" wrote in message ... "Richard" wrote in message ... "Michael G" wrote in message ... Most airlines have worked out that it is more convenient for passengers to be boarded by rows so that people who sit close to the front of the plane don't impede passengers trying to find their seats at the rear. Your staff at LGW have not grasped this simple concept. No, you're the one who hasn't grasped the concept. If the passengers seated in the front were to board first, then they would block the aisles for those passenegers with seats at the back of the plane while they stowed their carry-ons. When the passegners seated at the back board first, they quickly make their way to the back since they've no reason to loiter around the front. That's why boarding is done from back to front when it's not done as a free-for-all. I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? ant More like they were boarding by rows as is the norm and he missed it. BA are not perfect but the aircrew are certainly not rude. As for the luggage. Complete rubbish, they can't wait to get it out of the way and the cabin secure. If it was a problem it should have been in the hold. JRs |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"ant" wrote in message
... I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? Actually, considering the way he phrased it ("As our seats were at the rear of the plane we waited until most other passengers had boarded") it seemed to me that he expects airplanes force those in the rear to board last. I just feel he's making a big fuss over nothing. So what if they let everyone board at once? He had just as much time to find his way onto the plane as everyone else. He's the one who decided to wait until most of the other passengers had boarded. No one was holding him back. Richard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"ant" wrote in message
... I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? Actually, considering the way he phrased it ("As our seats were at the rear of the plane we waited until most other passengers had boarded") it seemed to me that he expects airplanes force those in the rear to board last. I just feel he's making a big fuss over nothing. So what if they let everyone board at once? He had just as much time to find his way onto the plane as everyone else. He's the one who decided to wait until most of the other passengers had boarded. No one was holding him back. Richard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard" wrote in message ... "ant" wrote in message ... I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? Actually, considering the way he phrased it ("As our seats were at the rear of the plane we waited until most other passengers had boarded") it seemed to me that he expects airplanes force those in the rear to board last. I just feel he's making a big fuss over nothing. So what if they let everyone board at once? He had just as much time to find his way onto the plane as everyone else. He's the one who decided to wait until most of the other passengers had boarded. No one was holding him back. Richard Yer right. And I've seen *very few* rude FA's on any airline. But most seem to get a bit testy when someone gets loud & obnoxious. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard" wrote in message ... "ant" wrote in message ... I thought this is what he ws complaining about, that they let people board willy-nilly, rather than loading the rear passengers first? Actually, considering the way he phrased it ("As our seats were at the rear of the plane we waited until most other passengers had boarded") it seemed to me that he expects airplanes force those in the rear to board last. I just feel he's making a big fuss over nothing. So what if they let everyone board at once? He had just as much time to find his way onto the plane as everyone else. He's the one who decided to wait until most of the other passengers had boarded. No one was holding him back. Richard Yer right. And I've seen *very few* rude FA's on any airline. But most seem to get a bit testy when someone gets loud & obnoxious. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Service Tech wrote:
And I've seen *very few* rude FA's on any airline. But most seem to get a bit testy when someone gets loud & obnoxious. I flew last summer from Dammam, Saudi Arabia to Frankfurt on Lufthansa with my cat in business class. The leg from Dammam to Dubai was fine, the flight attendents were very friendly. At Dubai, the crew was changed, and at first they were also very friendly, that is, until they asked me if I would change from my window to another aisle seat. Not wishing to further strain the cat, I declined. After that, I was virtually ignored. It had nothing to do with my behavior, it was just because I wouldn't go along with their request. I find some people in the airline industry unwilling to be helpful, and many down right obnoxious. Once when flying to Steamboat Springs from Denver on United Express, it was foggy in the morning and flights were delayed or canceled. The staff made no effort at all (actually virtually refused to help) to get on another flight. After making several inquiries over several hours and getting no response except just wait, I noticed flights departing again to Steamboat Springs. Counting the number of passengers, I realized that they were only half full. I went up and inquired again, and they sent me to another gate where I got a boarding pass immediately. The person in front of me asked innocently about his luggage, and the woman at the counter exploded and virtually accused him of assaulting her, and said something about not allowing him on the plane because of his obnoxious behavior. She was the only obnoxious one. If she had been a man, and he didn't slug her, I would have. Nobody deserves to be treated like that, and I was going to also ask the same question. I can't imagine letting anybody like that deal with the public. And when I got to Steamboat Springs, there was my suitcase sitting in the middle of the floor, probably for hours, waiting for somebody to walk off with it. George |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Service Tech wrote:
And I've seen *very few* rude FA's on any airline. But most seem to get a bit testy when someone gets loud & obnoxious. I flew last summer from Dammam, Saudi Arabia to Frankfurt on Lufthansa with my cat in business class. The leg from Dammam to Dubai was fine, the flight attendents were very friendly. At Dubai, the crew was changed, and at first they were also very friendly, that is, until they asked me if I would change from my window to another aisle seat. Not wishing to further strain the cat, I declined. After that, I was virtually ignored. It had nothing to do with my behavior, it was just because I wouldn't go along with their request. I find some people in the airline industry unwilling to be helpful, and many down right obnoxious. Once when flying to Steamboat Springs from Denver on United Express, it was foggy in the morning and flights were delayed or canceled. The staff made no effort at all (actually virtually refused to help) to get on another flight. After making several inquiries over several hours and getting no response except just wait, I noticed flights departing again to Steamboat Springs. Counting the number of passengers, I realized that they were only half full. I went up and inquired again, and they sent me to another gate where I got a boarding pass immediately. The person in front of me asked innocently about his luggage, and the woman at the counter exploded and virtually accused him of assaulting her, and said something about not allowing him on the plane because of his obnoxious behavior. She was the only obnoxious one. If she had been a man, and he didn't slug her, I would have. Nobody deserves to be treated like that, and I was going to also ask the same question. I can't imagine letting anybody like that deal with the public. And when I got to Steamboat Springs, there was my suitcase sitting in the middle of the floor, probably for hours, waiting for somebody to walk off with it. George |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I just feel he's making a big fuss over nothing. So what if they let everyone board at once? He had just as much time to find his way onto the plane as everyone else. He's the one who decided to wait until most of the other passengers had boarded. No one was holding him back. Richard Considering what the stupid tw(vowel)t wrote, its patently obvious that he is not a very regular air traveller. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Accuses British Airways of Recklessness | NEWS | Air travel | 145 | March 17th, 2005 07:41 PM |
SWA at PIT - The End of U.S. Airways? | Dain Bramage | Air travel | 2 | January 9th, 2005 03:41 PM |
SWA at PIT - The End of U.S. Airways? | Dain Bramage | Air travel | 0 | January 9th, 2005 03:28 PM |
SWA at PIT - The End of U.S. Airways? | Dain Bramage | Air travel | 0 | January 9th, 2005 03:28 PM |
British Airways emissions | Miss L. Toe | Air travel | 35 | July 19th, 2004 06:15 PM |