If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
George Kerby wrote:
SOME people are dumber than rocks... Speaking from experience? ;-) -Thad L. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Keith A. Glass writes:
I'm quite sure, however, Al-Qaeda and similar groups are VERY interested in this sort of thing. Not really. I'm quite sure they have other plans. Tell me, why do you seem to INSIST on making it easy for terrorists in DC ???? Tell me, if you destroy an aircraft loaded with radioactive material over Washington with a missile, where does the radioactive material go? -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Ron Hunter writes:
Yes, and why would they NOT want some people to know where, exactly, they are located? Duh? "On or around the White House" is already very exact indeed. Whether they are two feet to the right or two feet to the left doesn't matter. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
I would suggest the 'editing' is to obscure not only what missile type
(probably a platform based on the Stinger) but also what warning receivers are in place, and possibly hide the Phalanx type system that is normally a last ditch back-up. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
George Kerby wrote in message ...
On 5/10/04 3:29 AM, in article , "Ron Hunter" wrote: Yes, and why would they NOT want some people to know where, exactly, they are located? Duh? SOME people are dumber than rocks... At any rate, somebody alerted me by e-mail to uncensored USGS images at www.terrafly.com. Presumably they were taken earlier than the ones at Terraserver and also earlier than whatever was put in place on those roofs that they don't want us to know about. -- (Charles Packer) http://cpacker.org/whatnews |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tell me, if you destroy an aircraft loaded with radioactive material over Washington with a missile, where does the radioactive material go? How high is the aircraft, what sort of radioactive material, what amount of explosive, and what are the wind conditions? miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Charles Packer writes:
At any rate, somebody alerted me by e-mail to uncensored USGS images at www.terrafly.com. Presumably they were taken earlier than the ones at Terraserver and also earlier than whatever was put in place on those roofs that they don't want us to know about. There are plenty of spy satellites in the world, some of why can read the time on a person's watch. I rather doubt that terrorists have only the USGS as a source of images. I also rather doubt that they care what's on the roof of the White House, anyway. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
"~ Darrell ~" wrote in message .rogers.com... I would suggest the 'editing' is to obscure not only what missile type (probably a platform based on the Stinger) but also what warning receivers are in place, and possibly hide the Phalanx type system that is normally a last ditch back-up. I SERIOUSLY doubt that there's a Phalanx system. Spraying central DC with 20mm explosive shells at 6000 rounds per minute seems like a rather bad idea. Keith |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Vs. what?
Nick I SERIOUSLY doubt that there's a Phalanx system. Spraying central DC with 20mm explosive shells at 6000 rounds per minute seems like a rather bad idea. Keith |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
White House roof edited in USGS photos
Keith Willshaw wrote:
"~ Darrell ~" wrote in message .rogers.com... I would suggest the 'editing' is to obscure not only what missile type (probably a platform based on the Stinger) but also what warning receivers are in place, and possibly hide the Phalanx type system that is normally a last ditch back-up. I SERIOUSLY doubt that there's a Phalanx system. Spraying central DC with 20mm explosive shells at 6000 rounds per minute seems like a rather bad idea. Depends on whose side you're on. ;-) -- The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may often assume the appearance, and produce the effects, of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy. --Gibbon, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
White House asks Congress to back off on biometric passport requirement | Miguel Cruz | Europe | 13 | March 31st, 2004 05:56 AM |
Australia 3 Adfunk Internet Solutions Article | Jehad Internet | Australia & New Zealand | 0 | February 4th, 2004 12:20 AM |
AIRCRAFT SHOT DOWN NEAR WHITE HOUSE! | Camille | Air travel | 16 | January 8th, 2004 06:06 AM |
Detained at the whim of the president | Polybus | Air travel | 143 | December 28th, 2003 09:54 PM |