If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:01:38 -0400, NotPC
wrote: I don't condone bigots, but there is evidence, at least in other areas, of standard being lowered so that minority races and women could be promoted in certain positions or to permit them entry into certain educational institutions in order to meet a quota. The FAA Academy in Oklahoma City(Proven Known Fact)lowered entry requirements and testing requirements soon after Clinton's non-aviation background PC appointee(Jane Garvey)was crowned FAA Administrator. Where? Kindly prove it rather than just state something. The reason? A huge percentage of women and blacks could not pass the technical courses at the FAA Academy. Solution? Lower the Standards. Proof? Those diversity experiments of the early 90's and AL Gore's "Reinventing Government" a.k.a. PC mandates to purge white males from the FAA are now in high level positions in the FAA and Government. Some of those people (Mostly Black Females) could not find their ass with both hands. However, they are making major decisions that effect the FAA and ATC each day. Proof? Fast Forward. The FAA is a mess and airline delays are at a record and union relationships and employee morale is a mess in the FAA.(Under Female leadership) Did it work? Those Diversity experiments? The FAA has been a mess since I got my pilot's license which was 40 years ago. Long before any of what you assert was true. The evidence shows NO. It has been an unmitigated HR failure. Will it be fixed? NO. Why? Because white male sycophants in fear for their silly little jobs and others will not allow accountability of minorities because they are afraid they will scream racism and bigot.(See John Kulp) They are scared. You can also reference the Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton school of race card extortion. What evidence? This is just a lot of hand waving claims for which you have provided exactly NO evidence. No doubt because you, like the other meathead, have NONE. And you, like he, are also a bigot, because you are accusing whole classes if things where whole classes don't do anything together. Individuals do or don't. Got that? So now our Federal Government is filled to the rim with dead wood and layers of personnel that do what? Draw a check. No more and no less. FEMA the FAA and countless other Government organizations are a mess. Mindless bigotry once again. With no proof of anything. A big reason for that is they started using skin color and sex and social numbers rather than qualifications to hire and promote. Now we are paying the price. And will be paying for a long time to come. Our Federal Government operates with the same efficiency as a drunken tree sloth. You have no evidence and/or proof of any of this. It is just your mindless bigotry blathering. One last question. Exactly what is a minority? Define the term in 2007 language. I do know the City of Atlanta for example is a city that is mostly Black and votes all Black but still receives millions of tax dollars from IRS goon squads for disadvantaged and minority hiring. Mindlessly stupid. The IRS hands out refunds and nothing more. Congress does this and they all do it. See Ted Stevens, AK, Daniel Inouye, HW, Robert Byrd, WV for starters. What minority do they belong to moron? But WHITE people are the minority in Atlanta. What is the deal with that??? The deal is that there are fewer of them living there than blacks apparently. That's the deal. Political Correctness-Tyranny with Manners "Stop Kissing the Black Ass" Your head is so far up your ass it couldn't be kissed anyway |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:07:47 -0400, NotPC
wrote: Wouldn't make any difference since everyone just laughs at idiots like you anyway All you can do is name call rather than converse with intelligence. You must have a PhD from the Jesse Jackson School of Race Card Extortion. Congratulation's! your ignorance is exposed for all too see sir. You haven't shown one ounce of intelligence in your raving, ranting posts. And certainly no proof. You have simply blathered out the KKK mantra of bull****. BTW, my ass is not fat. I work for a living My mistake. It was your head planted up your ass that expanded it so I mistook it for being fat. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:18:24 -0500, "Allen"
wrote: "John Kulp" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:47:54 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: Jet fuel is basically kerosene, which is used for multiple purposes. You don't tax industries for fuel per se, but all users of the product. I don't think kerosene has every been taxed much, unlike gas. Everyone pays whatever the tax is on this. Do you not even read what you respond to? The post from Allen above shows you that the Jet Fuel Tax for GA is $0.218/gal. The same fuel used by Airlines is $0.043/gal. Yeah. That's why I said they pay whatever the tax is. I didn't realize from his desciption that only the $0.43 tax was the only tax airlines paid, though (it is actually $0.44). Who pays the second tax? I thought that was airlines as well, but apparently not. You need to put the decimal point in the correct spot - $.044 (four and four-tenths cents) per gallon for airlines. The segment and ticket tax is collected from the passengers, not paid by the airlines. That's true. I've been pushing too many numbers today. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:36:41 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote: (John Kulp) wrote in : On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:30:32 GMT, Marty Shapiro wrote: Apparently, you have never heard of approach control, ground control, or departure control. Have heard of them and even use them at times. Unless you are IFR, they are NOT needed at a vast majority of airports in the United States. Most airports in the U.S. do not have a control tower, and many of those who do do not have a 24 hour control tower. No local or ground controllers. No ground control. These aren't the airports that have much traffic or are the problem. Those are major airports, which do have ATC. And it is because of the AIRLINE traffic at those airports that ATC is needed there. GA is less than 5% of the operations at these airports. It is not GA that wants to have 59 operations at ORD from 8 PM to 8:14 PM every day. It is the airlines. Sure that's true alright. I was just commenting on where ATC is located, that's all. Even IFR, unless you are in the area of major airports, you may very well not have TRACON, ground, or local control. You take off with a clearance void time obtained from an RCO or relayed by FSS and once at sufficient altitude talk directly to the ARTCC for your location. Perhaps. It's been a loooong time since I was piloting aircraft. But then, what are the fees being talked about for exactly? Why, exactly, are the majors talking about their customers paying almost all the freight then? Because the majors are in a panic over the VLJ and fractional jets. The potential of the VLJ to siphon off the first & business class customers, which is where the profit is, terrifies the majors. This whole fee talk is about how to price these flights out of the market so the premium customers will continue to fly with the airlines. Where does this come from? This has already happened and the majors are selling plenty of business and first seats anyway. I don't see them panicking, just adjusting to changing market conditions, |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:09:36 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: John Kulp wrote: Nothing confusing about all this is there? No not really. It has worked for YEARS. It allows the airlines to pass on a cost directly to their passengers without a whole lot of trouble because it is a /pax tax. It is if you're not used to it. Well it has been there for years so the only folks that aren't used to it are those that don't fly on airlines in the USA. That's true. I have known about it for years because it gets routinely ripped off to fund the general deficit instead of going to airport improvement. I didn't know the amount, however. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Sep 13, 6:00 pm, (John Kulp) wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:07:47 -0400, NotPC wrote: BTW, my ass is not fat. I work for a living My mistake. It was your head planted up your ass that expanded it so I mistook it for being fat. LOL.... Gold! |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:50:33 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote: Fractional jets are here and they are starting to siphon some business away from the airlines. The VLJ's aren't here yet. The projections for the VLJ market, if correct, will put a severe dent in the airline's premium passenger traffic. Take a trip of say 1,000 miles or so. You can go to your nearby local airport and get a VLJ to fly direct to a nearby local airport at your destination. No requirement to be at the airport 2 hours before departure, no restrictions on liquids in your carry-on baggage, no TSA, no long drive to/from the airport served by the major, no dealing with connections at the hub, and the VLJ air taxi comes/goes on your schedule, not the airline's. The airlines can't do any of this and that's why they are terrified. The only way they can compete is to make it prohibatively expensive to fly on a VLJ. What you say is true, except I don't know of any majors looking at serving this market. The closest I know of are regional jets which only have economy seats. At least the ones I know. So why would it terrify them? CO, for example, has long de-emphasized this market as unprofitable and has concentrate on expanding internationally. All the others are doing the same. They aren't terrified, they are just looking at different markets where these guys can't compete. Look at an area like White Plains, NY with all the corporate HQs there. How many of the business / first class passengers would rather go to HPN and fly directly to their destination vs. having to drive to LGA, JFK, or EWR? Only the top executives get the company jet, the others need to go via airlines. If they had VLJ service at a cost of a first class ticket, would they bother to go via the major? They presumably wouldn't which is why the majors are doing what I described above. Two different markets entirely. How many first or business class tickets are really sold? I've been on flights where the first class cabin was full but most passengers were there on a mileage or frequent flyer upgrades. Those passengers who did pay full fare would be more than happy to fly on a VLJ and avoid the airline hassle completly, and those are the passengers the airlines are worried about. No they're not for the reasons I give above. There are still plenty of full paying premium passengers which the majors are competing for, not these guys. I know one person who always flies first class and he said he would gladly pay 20% more for the convenience of a VLJ. And he even dislikes small airplanes! The airlines can't compete with the VLJ. They know it. So they need a way to escalate the costs for the VLJ so high that people will not go to it, and the fee system is their solution. Sorry two different markets, as I said. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:38:56 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote: What you say is true, except I don't know of any majors looking at serving this market. The closest I know of are regional jets which only have economy seats. At least the ones I know. So why would it terrify them? CO, for example, has long de-emphasized this market as unprofitable and has concentrate on expanding internationally. All the others are doing the same. They aren't terrified, they are just looking at different markets where these guys can't compete. What market are you referring to? Flights of 3 hours or less? There are a lot of flights on the majors from 1 to 3 hours and they are not using regional jets on all of them. I've flown DEN to SFO/SJC on everything from 737/A320 up to 777 and 747. My last flight, scheduled for 1:20 was on a 737. Mainly the international ones. The domestic ones have been marginally profitable for years, which is why CO expanded over 25% after 9/11 while others contracted some 10+ %. I know one person who always flies first class and he said he would gladly pay 20% more for the convenience of a VLJ. And he even dislikes small airplanes! The airlines can't compete with the VLJ. They know it. So they need a way to escalate the costs for the VLJ so high that people will not go to it, and the fee system is their solution. Sorry two different markets, as I said. Even though the majors don't serve these markets directly, indirectly they do and derive revenue from them. And that revenue, mainly the premium first/business class revenue, is what they will no longer get. (They will continued to get the coach revenue.) The key thing is that this revenue is from a market they don't even serve or want to serve. I don't know what you mean. How does an airline derive revenue for indirect markets? Some major corporations have installations in areas the majors no longer want to serve, never did serve, or only provide service to a hub. The majors didn't care because prior to fractional jets and the VLJ there were no real alternatives. They got the business anyway. The top executives at large corporation got the company jet while everyone else either took a commuter flight or drove to the nearest airport served by the majors (which could be a 2+ hour drive) and then flew with a major to the destination, even when the destination was less than 3 hours away. Or, the only end to end service the majors offered was via a hub, no other viable choice was available. This is all domestic, as I said, which the majors have been cutting for some time to reposition internationally. With the advent of the fractional jet, this started to change. Smaller companies could now afford corporate jets for their executives, slightly cutting into the majors premium revenue. But this was generally restricted to the top executives, so the impact, while not trivial, wasn't too bad on the majors, but they did notice it. Soon the VLJ's will be providing more alternatives and at a cost which will permit middle level exeuctives or even lower (basically anyone who is permitted to fly first or business class) to justify using them. Couple this with the hassle of flying on a scheduled airline today, especially if a hub is involved, and this not so insignificant premium traffic will be lost to the majors. And this lost revenue will not be because the majors decreased or discontinued service to a small market. The majors never serviced the market yet they got revenue from it. Well, since they haven't been interested in these marginal markets for some time, and, at best serve them with regional jets or not at all, I don't understand what you think they are losing. It's just another market being served by these others you mentioned. Major airlines bookings are at all time records. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any problems with Travel Guard since they were bought by AIG? | Jeff Gersten | Cruises | 14 | November 26th, 2006 02:07 AM |
Florence Travel Article | [email protected] | Europe | 0 | September 16th, 2006 01:10 PM |
Australia Travel Article | [email protected] | Australia & New Zealand | 10 | September 15th, 2006 08:36 AM |
christmas air travel problems | Bill Hilton | USA & Canada | 2 | December 30th, 2004 10:31 AM |
old record and travel to USA - Anyone had problems? | bwfan | USA & Canada | 4 | January 2nd, 2004 09:48 PM |