Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

Monday, April 05, 2010

http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths

On major issues, 48% of voters say that the average Tea Party member
is closer to their views than President Barack Obama.

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 06:11:38 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "Tis
Odonovan, Himself" , wrote


Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

Monday, April 05, 2010

http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths

On major issues, 48% of voters say that the average Tea Party member
is closer to their views than President Barack Obama.

In just 14 months the obamanation went from America's dream to America's
nightmare. Liberals are mostly waking up from their daydream and hard
leftists are still salivating over the praise of obama from Fidel Castro
and obama's approval by Hugo Chavez.

FACE

On 5/04/10 21:26, in article ,
"FACE" wrote:

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

www.rasmussenreports.com/ and therefore suspect

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:33:57 +0200, in uk.politics.misc, Earl Evleth
, wrote

On 5/04/10 21:26, in article ,
"FACE" wrote:

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

www.rasmussenreports.com/ and therefore suspect

Gallups numbers are not as high but show the same larger support than
opposition to the tea party in particular. I don't know what the
Rasmussen Question was but it was apparently different.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/Te...ographics.aspx


In just 14 months the obamanation went from America's dream to America's
nightmare. Liberals are mostly waking up from their daydream and hard
leftists are still salivating over the praise of obama from Fidel Castro
and obama's approval by Hugo Chavez.

FACE

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:33:57 +0200, in uk.politics.misc, Earl Evleth
, wrote

On 5/04/10 21:26, in article ,
"FACE" wrote:

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

www.rasmussenreports.com/ and therefore suspect

Gallups numbers are particular to the Tea party movement and not as high
but show the same larger support than opposition. The Rasmussen Question
was but it was substantively different.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/Te...ographics.aspx
The Gallup question:

"5* When you think about the major issues facing the country, whose views
are closest to your own President Barack Obama or the average tea party
member?

44% President Barack Obama
48% The average Tea Party member
8% Not sure

NOTE: Margin of Sampling Error, +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level
of confidence"


In just 14 months the obamanation went from America's dream to America's
nightmare. Liberals are mostly waking up from their daydream and hard
leftists are still salivating over the praise of obama from Fidel Castro
and obama's approval by Hugo Chavez.

FACE

CORRECTION

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:26:41 -0500, in uk.politics.misc, FACE
, wrote

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:33:57 +0200, in uk.politics.misc, Earl Evleth
, wrote

On 5/04/10 21:26, in article ,
"FACE" wrote:

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

www.rasmussenreports.com/ and therefore suspect

Gallups numbers are particular to the Tea party movement and not as high
but show the same larger support than opposition. The Rasmussen Question
was but it was substantively different.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/Te...ographics.aspx
The RASMUSSEN question:

"5* When you think about the major issues facing the country, whose views
are closest to your own President Barack Obama or the average tea party
member?

44% President Barack Obama
48% The average Tea Party member
8% Not sure

NOTE: Margin of Sampling Error, +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level
of confidence"


In just 14 months the obamanation went from America's dream to America's
nightmare. Liberals are mostly waking up from their daydream and hard
leftists are still salivating over the praise of obama from Fidel Castro
and obama's approval by Hugo Chavez.

FACE

On Apr 5, 3:33 pm, Earl Evleth again exhibiting
his usual lack of political objectivty stupidly wrote:
"FACE" wrote:

Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

www.rasmussenreports.com/and therefore suspect

wikipedia.org:

"...A Fordham University analysis ranked Rasmussen Reports as the most
accurate national polling firm in Election 2008.[6]

Reports by Slate Magazine and The Wall Street Journal found that
Rasmussen Reports was one of the most accurate polling firms for the
2004 United States presidential election and 2006 United States
general elections.[8][9]...."

google searches:

Results 1 - 10 of about 935 for "rasmussen most accurate pollster".
(0.24 seconds)

Hickenlooper holds double-digit lead on McInnis in PPP poll | The Spot

The Rasmussen Poll accurately predicted the Scott Brown victory, and
has a storied history of accurate predictions. .
www.denverpost.com/news/ci_14646513 - Cached

The Rocky Mountain Collegian :: ...

Mar 29, 2010 ... The Rasmussen Poll accurately predicted Barak Obama's
presidential win, within 1% of the exact vote between Obama and
McCain. ...
http://www.collegian.com/.../top_con...ng_terr orism
- Cached

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On
04/07/2010 02:35 PM:

rick++ wrote:


Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.


Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.

FACE wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:58 PM:

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++"
, wrote

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life.

You're as much of an illiterate idiot as Bonde. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, twit.