If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
wrote in message
... (Anyway, aren't they First Peoples or something now? Or is that just native Canadians?) Generalized terms that refer to those who were in North America before the Europeans arrived include Native American, when referring to the people, and First Nations, when referring to the tribes. In practical matters it seems (at least here in Montreal) to be most common to use the name of a tribe as an adjective to describe a person belonging to that tribe in the same way that a native of Vienna could be described as Austrian. Richard |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
wrote in message
... (Anyway, aren't they First Peoples or something now? Or is that just native Canadians?) Generalized terms that refer to those who were in North America before the Europeans arrived include Native American, when referring to the people, and First Nations, when referring to the tribes. In practical matters it seems (at least here in Montreal) to be most common to use the name of a tribe as an adjective to describe a person belonging to that tribe in the same way that a native of Vienna could be described as Austrian. Richard |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
In article ,
(Mxsmanic) wrote: writes: But as you well know it was a common usage at one time. So must it remain so for eternity? It is rather glaringly incorrect. Indeed, but we can't change the past. Donna was merely pointing out that the usage, even if incorrect, is a possible reason for the name of the restaurant. Anyway, aren't they First Peoples or something now? Or is that just native Canadians? They are aborigines. Aborigine means "from the beginning," and is the correct word for someone who is of native ancestry since time immemorial. Yes, I know. I was asking a different question - I have heard the expression First Peoples, or possibly it was First Nations (I can't remember), which I understand to be a PC reference to aboriginal North Americans, but I am not sure whether it is used only in Canada (where I heard it) or in the US too. A "native American," in contrast, is simply anyone who was born in America, irrespective of ancestry. Unless it is obvious from the context that it means that and not an aboriginal American, I am sure nearly everybody would both intend and take it to mean an aboriginal American. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
Mxsmanic wrote:
jenn writes: duh -- that is what they call themselves and what they were traditionally called They traditionally called themselves by various names, depending on their tribes. today in the US 'native Americans' refer to themselves as Indians -- this may change tomorrow |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Paris Notes (2)
Mxsmanic wrote:
jenn writes: duh -- that is what they call themselves and what they were traditionally called They traditionally called themselves by various names, depending on their tribes. today in the US 'native Americans' refer to themselves as Indians -- this may change tomorrow |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paris Notes (1) | Padraig Breathnach | Europe | 157 | August 13th, 2004 04:21 PM |
Milan - Paris (Routes, cost etc.) | Piper | Europe | 12 | August 2nd, 2004 08:09 PM |
Climbing the Mountains around Paris | Earl | Europe | 8 | June 2nd, 2004 03:19 PM |
RER and bus tariffs in Paris and around | Giovanni Drogo | Europe | 2 | February 23rd, 2004 08:18 PM |
American Restaurant in Paris | Earl Evleth | Europe | 387 | December 22nd, 2003 07:59 PM |