If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Air Cargo Security?
Pilots, lawmakers slam air cargo security
By Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, Oct. 1 (UPI) -- The Transportation Security Administration came under fire Wednesday from airline labor unions, survivors of terror attacks, consumer advocates and lawmakers, who said the agency was failing to fix "a gaping loophole" in the nation's aviation security. They charged that allowing unscreened cargo on board passenger planes leaves the back door of air travel wide open to terrorists. "As the TSA takes away travelers' nail clippers, passengers are biting their nails, because no one inspects for bombs without boarding passes in the cargo hold of airplanes," Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., told reporters. But TSA spokesman Brian Turmail said the agency was doing all it could to ensure passenger safety, without destroying the air cargo business -- vital to "just-in-time" delivery and therefore to the U.S. economy. Wednesday, an advisory group set up by the TSA -- consisting of representatives of various aviation industries, labor unions and advocacy groups -- presented its recommendations on air cargo security to the agency. Several of its members, who joined Markey and Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., at a Capitol Hill news conference, dissented from the report. The report recommended enhancing the so-called known-shipper program, under which airlines register shipping companies thought to be trustworthy, based on criteria such as how long they have been in business. The exact criteria are not made public for security reasons. The TSA audits the registration and only those companies who have it are allowed to put cargo on passenger planes. The advisory panel recommended that the registration criteria be expanded -- effectively making it harder to get into the program -- and that the TSA begin doing the registration itself. Critics say the system is inadequate, and point to the recent case of a man who had himself shipped from New York to Texas by a registered company. "The known-shipper program should be called the unknown-cargo program," said Markey, and Shays added, "(The program) turns screening into a piece of paper, and a piece of paper is not going to tell anyone what's in (a)... box which is being placed on a plane." "In order to have true cargo security," American Airlines pilot Paul Rancatore said, "there has to be inspection of everything that's placed on board an aircraft." The TSA will produce a strategic plan on air cargo security at the end of October, and then draft regulations, which will come into effect next year. "Our goal is to screen as much cargo as we possibly can," said Turmail. He said that the technology used to screen checked baggage cannot be used on most cargo, which is palletized, because the pallets are too large. He acknowledged that there are machines which are used to screen sea-borne cargo containers in ports, but "they have a very large footprint," which means it may not be practical to site them in airports. He pointed out that $55 million had been set aside in the appropriations bill President Bush signed Wednesday to develop new technology to make electronic screening of cargo pallets possible, and that a pilot program involving the electronic screening of cargo for passenger planes would begin "as soon as we can." The bill also provides $30 million for enhancing the known shipper program, and funds to expand TSA's canine and human inspection force -- there is cash for 100 new inspectors, Turmail said. Critics charge that the TSA's progress is too slow. "There are no deadlines ... so unless Congress does something to order TSA to implement inspections it will be 20 years and we still won't have them," said Chris Witkowski from the Association of Flight Attendants, part of the AFL-CIO. He said that the Aviation Security Improvement Act, passed 13 years ago in 1990 had included provisions about cargo security. "It is time for congress to act," he concluded. Rancatore, speaking for the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, pointed out that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, which set up the TSA in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, had mandated the screening of all passengers, luggage, mail and cargo placed aboard passenger planes. "Unfortunately, a game of semantics had been played where congress' intent has been diluted (to a point where) 'screening' (means) the known shipper program." Markey had put forward an amendment to the appropriations bill that would have mandated screening of cargo on passenger planes by the end of the year. Despite being passed by a large, bi-partisan majority on the House floor, it was stripped out of the bill in conference. He and Shays vowed to continue pressing their cause. Five members of the advisory panel -- the Aviation Security Advisory Committee -- dissented from its recommendations: the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, the Association of Flight Attendants, the Allied Pilots Association, the Aviation Consumer Action Program, and the Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 group, which represents relatives of those killed in the bombing of that plane above Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. Turmail said the TSA was "excited to get both the recommendations and the dissent. This kind of discussion is essential. We will listen to everyone and consider everything they say when drawing up our strategic plan." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Air Cargo Security?
UPI = Moonie Bull****
"Steve Dufour" wrote in message m... Pilots, lawmakers slam air cargo security By Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, Oct. 1 (UPI) -- The Transportation Security Administration came under fire Wednesday from airline labor unions, survivors of terror attacks, consumer advocates and lawmakers, who said the agency was failing to fix "a gaping loophole" in the nation's aviation security. They charged that allowing unscreened cargo on board passenger planes leaves the back door of air travel wide open to terrorists. "As the TSA takes away travelers' nail clippers, passengers are biting their nails, because no one inspects for bombs without boarding passes in the cargo hold of airplanes," Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., told reporters. But TSA spokesman Brian Turmail said the agency was doing all it could to ensure passenger safety, without destroying the air cargo business -- vital to "just-in-time" delivery and therefore to the U.S. economy. Wednesday, an advisory group set up by the TSA -- consisting of representatives of various aviation industries, labor unions and advocacy groups -- presented its recommendations on air cargo security to the agency. Several of its members, who joined Markey and Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., at a Capitol Hill news conference, dissented from the report. The report recommended enhancing the so-called known-shipper program, under which airlines register shipping companies thought to be trustworthy, based on criteria such as how long they have been in business. The exact criteria are not made public for security reasons. The TSA audits the registration and only those companies who have it are allowed to put cargo on passenger planes. The advisory panel recommended that the registration criteria be expanded -- effectively making it harder to get into the program -- and that the TSA begin doing the registration itself. Critics say the system is inadequate, and point to the recent case of a man who had himself shipped from New York to Texas by a registered company. "The known-shipper program should be called the unknown-cargo program," said Markey, and Shays added, "(The program) turns screening into a piece of paper, and a piece of paper is not going to tell anyone what's in (a)... box which is being placed on a plane." "In order to have true cargo security," American Airlines pilot Paul Rancatore said, "there has to be inspection of everything that's placed on board an aircraft." The TSA will produce a strategic plan on air cargo security at the end of October, and then draft regulations, which will come into effect next year. "Our goal is to screen as much cargo as we possibly can," said Turmail. He said that the technology used to screen checked baggage cannot be used on most cargo, which is palletized, because the pallets are too large. He acknowledged that there are machines which are used to screen sea-borne cargo containers in ports, but "they have a very large footprint," which means it may not be practical to site them in airports. He pointed out that $55 million had been set aside in the appropriations bill President Bush signed Wednesday to develop new technology to make electronic screening of cargo pallets possible, and that a pilot program involving the electronic screening of cargo for passenger planes would begin "as soon as we can." The bill also provides $30 million for enhancing the known shipper program, and funds to expand TSA's canine and human inspection force -- there is cash for 100 new inspectors, Turmail said. Critics charge that the TSA's progress is too slow. "There are no deadlines ... so unless Congress does something to order TSA to implement inspections it will be 20 years and we still won't have them," said Chris Witkowski from the Association of Flight Attendants, part of the AFL-CIO. He said that the Aviation Security Improvement Act, passed 13 years ago in 1990 had included provisions about cargo security. "It is time for congress to act," he concluded. Rancatore, speaking for the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, pointed out that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, which set up the TSA in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, had mandated the screening of all passengers, luggage, mail and cargo placed aboard passenger planes. "Unfortunately, a game of semantics had been played where congress' intent has been diluted (to a point where) 'screening' (means) the known shipper program." Markey had put forward an amendment to the appropriations bill that would have mandated screening of cargo on passenger planes by the end of the year. Despite being passed by a large, bi-partisan majority on the House floor, it was stripped out of the bill in conference. He and Shays vowed to continue pressing their cause. Five members of the advisory panel -- the Aviation Security Advisory Committee -- dissented from its recommendations: the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, the Association of Flight Attendants, the Allied Pilots Association, the Aviation Consumer Action Program, and the Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 group, which represents relatives of those killed in the bombing of that plane above Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. Turmail said the TSA was "excited to get both the recommendations and the dissent. This kind of discussion is essential. We will listen to everyone and consider everything they say when drawing up our strategic plan." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Personal security - South Africa | Larry | Africa | 7 | January 12th, 2004 09:39 AM |
JetBlue Gave Defense Firm Files on Passengers | citizen | Air travel | 13 | September 24th, 2003 07:43 PM |
Security Delays at SEA? | Stephen Dailey | Air travel | 3 | September 22nd, 2003 05:18 PM |
More Security Stupidity | PTRAVEL | Air travel | 2 | September 22nd, 2003 02:10 AM |
Man in Cargo Plane Exposes Security Gaps | admin | Air travel | 82 | September 20th, 2003 06:06 PM |