I'm tired of the french bashing

Greylock wrote:

I did not bash Canadians. I don't have anything against Canadians,
except you.

You DID bash Americans.

And you bashed the French with comments about their government being corrupt and
selling weapons to people that they were bound not to. This seems odd in the
face of the American conflict against people who they had previously sold
weapons too. To many of us, it is more than a little ironic that Americans
accuse the French of arming their enemies when they had been doing it
themselves.

As my uncle died near Bastogne trying to stop Panzers with grenades,
I don't give a flying **** what your opinion is because I have quite
a lot of information about what went on. And it didn't come from
Hollyweird. It also didn't come from Canadian comic books.

I am sorry for your uncle. I lost an uncle in combat in Europe before the US was
even in the war. My father was fighting over there before the US entered the
war.


**** off you jackass, and by the way, it's a sign of very bad manners
to post directly to someone from a newsgroup instead of keeping it in
the group. Not that I am surprised by that further aspect of your lack
of character.

You are a lying, hypocritical jerk. The reason that I wrote you directly was
because I replied to the personal email that you sent me. I also sent it the the
group in which I had originally replied. Since you don't understand the irony of
an American complaining another country arming the enemy that it had itself
armed, then you probably have even more trouble understanding the hypocrisy of
whining about me responding to a personal email with a direct reply to it. I
suggest that if you want to keep discussions in the group, then perhaps you
should not be sending mail to me. That is really pathetic.

BTW, I have not deleted that mail, so I can always forward it back as roof of
your stupidity.