If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mary Pegg wrote:
Mary Pegg wrote: http://www.direct-travel.co.uk/ Thanks, sounds good. I've a quote from Asda (of all people) for ~55 GBP for multi-trip exc. North America - will check the above and report back! Direct Travel produced a quote for 51, including North America. Ouch !!! The Directs travel quote for my husband and I was £175, thats £62 more than the equivalent cover from Churchill !!! The only difference is they also include 17 days wintersports-which we don't need. Jan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Not sure where these quotes of AU$500 etc are coming from - I
sincerely hope that's NOT what they have to pay in Oz! :-( It seems to be an antipodean thing. 2 years ago I bought an annual travel policy in NZ(as I was going back to the UK and across the ditch to Aus regularly for work) It cost over NZ$700 (can't remember the exact amount now) This was for a worldwide multi-trip policy with each trip covered for a maximum of 42 days. I was dumbfounded at this as I was used to the relatively cheap annual policies I used to buy in the UK, but it was still cheaper than buying individual policies for each trip as these horrendous prices aren't just limited to annual policies on my last trip to the UK for 6 weeks I was quoted around NZ$450 (for a single trip policy) (We can get similar cover by using a gold credit card from our local bank as long as we pay for at least 50% of the trip on the card and as the annual fee is $100 we use this method these days) (On the other hand other insurances eg car seem to be cheaper than in the UK) Ian |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:12 GMT, Mary Pegg
wrote: Simon Pleasants wrote: You haven't said what country you're from but I'm guessing it's the UK, based on your email address (and rDNS for your news server is in Cambridge). Golly, what a lot of work to go to... given the subject line grin. Doh! I read it too - it must have just somehow got lost. My brain has not worked well this week. I bought a new car at the weekend, picked it up the morning and left my old car with the dealer (as part exchange). Got to work to discover my brief case, including all the system backups for my company (not to mention my lunch), was still in the old car. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[Please note :-), I changed the 'Subject:'.]
Simon Pleasants wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:12 GMT, Mary Pegg wrote: Simon Pleasants wrote: You haven't said what country you're from but I'm guessing it's the UK, based on your email address (and rDNS for your news server is in Cambridge). Golly, what a lot of work to go to... given the subject line grin. Doh! I read it too - it must have just somehow got lost. My brain has not worked well this week. I bought a new car at the weekend, picked it up the morning and left my old car with the dealer (as part exchange). Got to work to discover my brief case, including all the system backups for my company (not to mention my lunch), was still in the old car. No worries, Simon. It happens all the time. For some reason or another, many (most?) people do not really read/catch the 'Subject:' of a thread/article. Even after 20+ years on Usenet it still happens to me. For example I did catch the "insurance for travel" bit, but I noticed the ".uk" bit in Mary's e-mail address. I didn't catch it from the 'Subject:'. Also I didn't catch the "PNG" bit untill it was mentioned in the/a *body* (by Les). I thought "Why does he say '(PNG?)'?", but thought nothing further of it, because it was not relevant for my response. Only *later*, I saw that it was in the 'Subject:'. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Jul 2005 09:19:12 GMT, Frank Slootweg
wrote: No worries, Simon. It happens all the time. For some reason or another, many (most?) people do not really read/catch the 'Subject:' of a thread/article. At work I am very particular about making subject lines relevant and accurate, freely biting the head off anyone who sends me something with "stuff" or something equally useless in the subject line. I am normally very careful to read them but on this occasion I only took note of the fact she was asking about insurance. The fact that some people responded by quoting Australian policies in local currency probably didn't help me focus on the actual question either! I still felt a pratt phoning the car dealership and asking if they could rescue my brief case from the car and keep it safe for my return this evening. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Slootweg wrote:
No worries, Simon. It happens all the time. For some reason or another, many (most?) people do not really read/catch the 'Subject:' of a thread/article. Fair point, I should've repeated the info in the body. -- "I was nauseous and tingly all over. I was either in love or I had smallpox." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|