If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Film Cameras in Checked Luggage
Frank Slootweg wrote:
James Robinson wrote: Frank Slootweg wrote: James Robinson wrote: Frank Slootweg wrote: James Robinson wrote: You can still carry cameras aboard on flights originating in the USA. The only place in the world that restricts you are flights originating in the UK. I think you are mistaken. Our (August 12) newspaper had a picture of (*TSA*) guards at Denver airport disallowing a bottle of babyfood in passenger's carryon luggage. Last time I checked, Denver was not in the UK (Well, at least the UK one doesn't have TSA staff.). Baby food is not a camera, which was the subject at hand. I realize(d) that. My point is that it was at least implied that only flight originating in the UK had/have restrictions. That's clearly not the case. Also I don't see why a camera would be treated differently than the other electronic items which *were/are* banned. So I think it's safe to assume that, at least for some time, cameras were banned also on flights which did not originate in the UK. Electronic items were not banned in carry-on bags in the US, nor are they now banned. The only restrictions were on liquids/gels/pastes. You could carry your cell phone, laptop, PDA, camera, etc. aboard in your carry-on bags. I was not talking about "in the US". I was and am objecting to your "The only place in the world that restricts you are flights originating in the UK.". That was just plain wrong, both for baby food and cameras. Example of the latter: Passenger had to check in camera on flight from Perth, Australia, via Singapore, to London. Yes the *onward* flight was from London (to Amsterdam), i.e. "originating in the UK", but with a *different* airline and the camera had already to be checked in in Perth. You have a strange way of pointing that out. The original poster said that you couldn't carry cameras on board, implying that it applied everywhere in the world. I pointed out that the only place that restricted the carriage of cameras in carry-on bags was the UK. You then brought up baby food in Denver, (assuming that the baby hadn't brought it up first) which was clearly a non-sequitor. You then mention that electronic equipment was banned, implying that such equipment was banned everywhere. I then pointed out that the ban only applied to flights originating in the UK, and used the US as an example, which has no general ban on electronic equipment. (Many people at the time this was posted thought they couldn't carry laptops aboard, even in the US.) Now you are saying that the ban applied to people who would be connecting in the UK, which had nothing to do with baby food in Denver, and certainly wasn't a general ban. It involved a route that would have the passenger connecting in the UK, which does have the ban. So what this all boils down to, is that at the time of the original posting, cameras couldn't be carried aboard flights originating in the UK. By extension, that included flights in other countries where the passenger would be connecting to a flight originating in the UK. Cameras were not a problem on other flights outside of the UK. All of this is now moot, in that the UK permits a small carry-on tote bag, and as long as your camera will fit in the bag, you can carry it aboard. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Idiocy of Federal Airport Security | ### Tired Of Spam ### | Air travel | 5 | August 17th, 2005 02:00 PM |
Longshoremen Put in Cuffs! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 28 | June 25th, 2005 02:44 AM |
Update on stolen digital camera in checked luggage | yaofeng | Air travel | 10 | June 23rd, 2005 06:55 AM |
flying, film and X-rays | Lisa Horton | Air travel | 3 | February 16th, 2004 08:20 PM |
Encounters with the TSA | Lansbury | Air travel | 297 | November 13th, 2003 01:20 PM |