If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
As someone who has lived in California 23 of the 35 years of my life I
think I can explain it. (I was in hurricaine andrew as well as the 89 earthquake in the bay area) Hurricaines you can see coming. You CAN get away. You can LIVE. Earthquakes sneak up on you. Your just laying there one day, and boom! your world is destroyed (Try that when your 11 years old!) Hurricaines let you get away, screw some of your stuff if you have to. ITS JUST STUFF! All my life I have wanted to live in florida because they do not have earthquakes. Believe me, dont knock a hurricaine until youve been throuigh one. Try an earthquake....youll take the hurricaine, I promise you. In the easrthquake of 1989 I saw my mother almost die (she ran outside when it happened and was almost crushed by our falling chimney, my father pulled her out). I lost my house. I lost everyTHING i had as a child. I feel if there is a hurricaine coming, do your best to get your stuff, But at least YOU can be saved. Its not a suprise. So I choose florida. Right now Im going to Texas, so Im halfway there. Thanks for listening |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
"AC" wrote in message
... Babies aren't born killers. Society shapes them into killers. If Society is responsible for shaping babies into killers, why don't we have more killers? Does Society single out a few babies for this shaping process? Is there some kind of entrance exam for babies to take in order to get into the right programs? My heart bleeds for kids who have a-holes for parents, or no parents at all and spend their entire childhoods in orphanages or in and out of crappy foster homes. Abuse is a difficult thing to overcome. But, as an adult, every killer or criminal makes his or her own choices. And when one of them kills one of your family members, come talk to me about the method by which you want to see them executed. Terry Gowan |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
|
#214
|
|||
|
|||
I've lived in Florida for 25 years, as of April. This year, I
experienced my first hurricane. A neighbor's tree punched a small hole in my screened porch roof, which cost me $4.00 worth of epoxy to repair. I've enjoyed great beaches, low living costs, including no state income taxes, and a great family atmosphere. I can ignore the fact that the state is governed by the brother of our befuddled president. What's your excuse for living where you live?? |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
I've lived in Florida for 25 years, as of April. This year, I
experienced my first hurricane. A neighbor's tree punched a small hole in my screened porch roof, which cost me $4.00 worth of epoxy to repair. I've enjoyed great beaches, low living costs, including no state income taxes, and a great family atmosphere. I can ignore the fact that the state is governed by the brother of our befuddled president. What's your excuse for living where you live?? |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
I'd suggest that you're all right to a degree.
The way I would suggest it works, is that many (if not, all) people are born with a certain propensity to behave anti-socially. Using that logic, to class someone as a born killer is only half right - some people will leave it at road-rage, or petty nastiness, and others will take it to the limit. Another big factor, is the benefit/gain situation, in which - if someone has nothing "to live for", or a series of painful, unresolved issues in their past, then the prospect of being incarcerated/incinerated by society for their lack of restraint, is weighed up by the individual's assessment of the value of their current situation. Not all criminals are simply idiots, acting on impulse. We need to recognise these people a lot better, and help them before it's too late. If the stigma society attaches to seeking, or receiving psycological help was removed for a starter, we might be on the right track... "Terry Gowan" t wrote in message ink.net... "AC" wrote in message ... Babies aren't born killers. Society shapes them into killers. If Society is responsible for shaping babies into killers, why don't we have more killers? Does Society single out a few babies for this shaping process? Is there some kind of entrance exam for babies to take in order to get into the right programs? My heart bleeds for kids who have a-holes for parents, or no parents at all and spend their entire childhoods in orphanages or in and out of crappy foster homes. Abuse is a difficult thing to overcome. But, as an adult, every killer or criminal makes his or her own choices. And when one of them kills one of your family members, come talk to me about the method by which you want to see them executed. Terry Gowan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
I'd suggest that you're all right to a degree.
The way I would suggest it works, is that many (if not, all) people are born with a certain propensity to behave anti-socially. Using that logic, to class someone as a born killer is only half right - some people will leave it at road-rage, or petty nastiness, and others will take it to the limit. Another big factor, is the benefit/gain situation, in which - if someone has nothing "to live for", or a series of painful, unresolved issues in their past, then the prospect of being incarcerated/incinerated by society for their lack of restraint, is weighed up by the individual's assessment of the value of their current situation. Not all criminals are simply idiots, acting on impulse. We need to recognise these people a lot better, and help them before it's too late. If the stigma society attaches to seeking, or receiving psycological help was removed for a starter, we might be on the right track... "Terry Gowan" t wrote in message ink.net... "AC" wrote in message ... Babies aren't born killers. Society shapes them into killers. If Society is responsible for shaping babies into killers, why don't we have more killers? Does Society single out a few babies for this shaping process? Is there some kind of entrance exam for babies to take in order to get into the right programs? My heart bleeds for kids who have a-holes for parents, or no parents at all and spend their entire childhoods in orphanages or in and out of crappy foster homes. Abuse is a difficult thing to overcome. But, as an adult, every killer or criminal makes his or her own choices. And when one of them kills one of your family members, come talk to me about the method by which you want to see them executed. Terry Gowan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
I can ignore the
fact that the state is governed by the brother of our befuddled president. What's your excuse for living where you live?? What's your excuse for being befuddled? |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
"AC" wrote in message ... I'd suggest that you're all right to a degree. The way I would suggest it works, is that many (if not, all) people are born with a certain propensity to behave anti-socially. Using that logic, to class someone as a born killer is only half right - some people will leave it at road-rage, or petty nastiness, and others will take it to the limit. Another big factor, is the benefit/gain situation, in which - if someone has nothing "to live for", or a series of painful, unresolved issues in their past, then the prospect of being incarcerated/incinerated by society for their lack of restraint, is weighed up by the individual's assessment of the value of their current situation. Not all criminals are simply idiots, acting on impulse. We need to recognise these people a lot better, and help them before it's too late. If the stigma society attaches to seeking, or receiving psycological help was removed for a starter, we might be on the right track... Psychological help? I'm sorry, but there are no treatments for people like Ted Bundy and such individuals aren't about to seek help under any circumstances. They are like wolves that hunt among us. We could probably predict, via genetic testing, whether "serial killer" markers present in an infant (or just about any other deviant behavioral pattern) are likely lead to tragic ends in many individuals. What good would that be? You certainly couldn't act on that information - even if it were shown to be highly reliable. The only possible action would be to remove those individuals from society based upon the presumption that they were a danger. We certainly don't know how to correct the problems. Seems to me there was a Tom Cruise movie on that sort of topic - predicting future crimes and arresting the suspect in advance. Great concept.... except that the person is, by definition, not guilty. I suspect that the future is a little more along the Twilight Zone lines of being able to detect and predict all sorts of abnormal tendencies or predispositions and then perform "adjustments" in the womb. The question then becomes just how monochromatic you want to have your species become as you achieve the ability to micro-manage your offspring's genetic make-up. Sure... nobody wants to give birth to a future serial killer. What about "fixing" children that would be born with emotional problems that would surely torment them all their lives, but also might produce the next van Gogh? The random nature of our reproductive process gives us plenty of rejects, but it also coughs up an occasional Triple 7 like Einstein or da Vinci. If you still believe that children are "blank slates" and that all "deviant" behavior is learned, then there's no point in us chatting. The apparent role that genetics plays in determining who we become appears to grow with each passing year and each new discovery. Ü |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
fact that the state is governed by the brother of our befuddled
president. Were you alive during World War II? You sound like another sucker listening to the media. Did it ever occur to you that CNN and Fox news don't know "top secret" events going on around the world? Or do you think they are privy to that and top ranking cabinet members are going to tell? Are you really so impressionable that you think George W. Bush would authorized a war and billions of dollars for cheaper gasoline? Obviously you are naive. Anyone that thinks it's normal to allow a dictator who killed tens of thousands of his own people with poison gas is befuddled. Sadaam a little like the person we fought against in a World War called Hitler! Unfortunately to stay safe here, we cannot sit on our hands and let a wacko build up power and weapons. He was testing the crap out on his own people, who do you think was next? When a man is as rich and powerful as Sadam or other leaders, the only thing left to feed the beast is conquering, and we sir, are the biggest prize of all. Wake up and smell the coffee and use your brain and think for yourself. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car Use Drives Up Weight, Study Finds | Earl | Europe | 0 | May 31st, 2004 06:59 PM |
Quiet places to live in Florida | Peter Callison | USA & Canada | 7 | April 13th, 2004 06:31 AM |
The Ethnic People of Yunnan | Edward He | Asia | 5 | April 11th, 2004 01:02 PM |
Gene Difference May Explain SARS Epidemic | Mighty Land | Asia | 6 | February 10th, 2004 10:37 AM |