Bangkok No Fun any more

Dave Baker wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:09:19 +0800, "....lobert...." lobert@.. wrote:

Dave Baker wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:33:47 +0800, "....lobert...." lobert@.. wrote:

Dave Baker wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:07:27 +0800, "....lobert...." lobert@.. wrote:

Dave Baker wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:34:54 +0800, "....lobert...." lobert@.. wrote:

Dave Baker wrote:
On 17 Mar 2006 04:53:13 -0800, "Tchiowa" wrote:

Whoever is telling the truth I still stand by my position that there is
a democratic process in place in Thailand and that any use of street
violence and thuggery to change the leadership of the country is wrong.
But street violence & thuggery are ok when ordered by Thaksin? Seems to be
what you are saying.

Dave
Thaksin's supporters did not block the roads or buildings. Only the
opposition ruffians are blocking the roads ignoring the inconvenience of
the Thai people for their own selfish cause.
Thaksin's "supporters" killed 2000 people without any charges, let along
convictions!

Drug pest kill more people and also made money from them. Their own law,
their own court and their own convictions.
So, what you are admitting is that Thaksin is no better than the drug pests?
His campaign did not abide by the law, had no courts, and certainly no
convictions. On top of which they even admitted that innocents were killed.

More innocent will be killed by drug pest if he did not do it.
Doesn't answer my question.

Your question has no answer, only effect of the operation is important.

Seeing you are being so obtuse, I'll summarize for you.

It appears that you don't give a damn that:

a) innocent people got killed
b) The operation was a failure
c) It was extra-judicial.

Thanks for clarifying your complete lack of morality.


It depends on how many people killed by the drug pest and how many
killed in operations.