What do you think is better - New Zealand or Australia and why ?

What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think is better -
New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and Aussies and please say why ?

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:32:02 -0700 (PDT), Sean
wrote:

What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think is better -
New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and Aussies and please say why ?

Which trolls do you think are best? Idiots or dickheads and
please state why.


Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan_s/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com
Latest: The Taj Mahal

"Alan S" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:32:02 -0700 (PDT), Sean
wrote:

What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think is better -
New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and Aussies and please say why ?

Which trolls do you think are best? Idiots or dickheads and
please state why.


Trolls aside, rec.travel.australia+nz appears to be near death. Thanks,
spammers and idiots.

Cheers,
George W Russell
Bangalore

In article , grusl says...

Trolls aside, rec.travel.australia+nz appears to be near death. Thanks,
spammers and idiots.

rta isn't doing much better. 90% of the posts here are spam. Easy to
filter automatically away, but still spam.
--

Alfred Molon
http://www.molon.de - Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

Most x-posts cut

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:56:16 +0200, Alfred Molon
wrote:

In article , grusl says...

Trolls aside, rec.travel.australia+nz appears to be near death. Thanks,
spammers and idiots.

rta isn't doing much better. 90% of the posts here are spam. Easy to
filter automatically away, but still spam.

Common problem on all of usenet I'm afraid.

However, both for travel and diabetes information, I still
learned more of value on usenet than from any other source.
Sure, I had to wade through a lot of swine and muck to find
the pearls - but they were worth finding.

Thanks to the few out there who provided the good info.


Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan_s/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com
Latest: The Taj Mahal

thats why you're plaguing the europe group with your witty useless remarks ?

"grusl" a écrit dans le message de
...

"Alan S" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:32:02 -0700 (PDT), Sean
wrote:

What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think is better -
New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and Aussies and please say why ?

Which trolls do you think are best? Idiots or dickheads and
please state why.


Trolls aside, rec.travel.australia+nz appears to be near death. Thanks,
spammers and idiots.

Cheers,
George W Russell
Bangalore

It'd have to be a Kiwi asking!!

To everyone else - it's blindingly obvious!!!




"Sean" wrote in message
...
What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think is better -
New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and Aussies and please say why ?

New Zealand is better


--
dsouza
Message Origin: TRAVEL.com

Sean wrote:

What or who do you (humorously or seriously) think
is better - New Zealand and Kiwis, or Australia and
Aussies and please say why ?

People are cool in OZ and NZ. If you disagree, it's
your fault.

Where would I rather live?
OZ!
Why?
I'd rather not live on a fault line.
I prefer to live on flat land.

I prefer four seasons and like winter
especially because the ground freezes
and last year's insects die - so fewer
insects come spring. So to me, places
in OZ like Armidale and Jindabyne are
on the top of my list. If it weren't
for the Pacific Rim fault line, South
Island might be a nice place for me
to live. And they again being able
to legally run a moonshine still makes
NZ attractive.

But you can also legally make moonshine
in Peru, but I wouldn't want to live
there.

Dick